Their combined citations are counted only for the first article. Merged citations. This "Cited by" count includes citations to the following articles in Scholar. Add co-authors Co-authors. Upload PDF. Follow this author. New articles by this author. New citations to this author. New articles related to this author's research.
Email address for updates. My profile My library Metrics Alerts. Sign in. Get my own profile Cited by All Since Citations 46 43 h-index 5 5 iindex 0 0. Renal transplantation pediatric nephrology clinical nephrology intervention nephrology.
- Save Time and Improve Your Marks with Cite This For Me;
- Systems Leadership: Creating Positive Organisations.
- What is a Kidney Transplant??
- Palestinian Art.
- What Happens When Kidneys Fail?;
Articles Cited by. The issue, therefore, is whether he submitted sufficient medical evidence to establish the causal relationship between his left foot condition and his work on that date.
The Board finds that the medical evidence does not provide a rationalized medical opinion to establish that this employment incident caused his left foot condition. It appears that appellant had previous surgery to his left foot. James Sammarco related that a stress fracture was caused by repetition of weight-bearing activities.
- Table of contents!
- John Fisher - Cardinal under Henry VIII?
- Our Bestsellers.
Appellant submitted a note by Dr. However, Dr. An award of compensation may not be based on surmise, conjecture or speculation. The Act provides that the Office may review an award for or against compensation upon application by an employee who receives an adverse decision.
Register for a free account
The employee may obtain this relief through a request to the district Office. The request, along with the supporting statements and evidence, is called the application for reconsideration. To require the Office to reopen a case for merit review under 5 U. If reconsideration is granted, the case is reopened and is reviewed on the merits.
He did not submit any new relevant legal argument, nor did he allege that the Office erroneously applied or interpreted a specific point of law. Consequently, he is not entitled to a review of the merits of his claim based on the first and second requirements of section With respect to the third requirement, submitting relevant and pertinent new evidence not previous considered by the Office, the Board finds that the evidence is duplicative of reports and documents previously considered.
Material which is cumulative or duplicative of that already in the record had no evidentiary value in establishing the claim and does not constitute a basis for reopening a case for further merit review. Farooki does not address the underlying issue of causation.
Join Kobo & start eReading today
Accordingly, appellant has failed to submit evidence sufficient to warrant further merit review of the claim. Gerson, Judge.
- Renal Transplant - ECAB;
- Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.
- Liver Disease & Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment.
- Before I Met You.
Groom, Alternate Judge. Haynes, Alternate Judge.
Renal Transplant - ECAB - 1st Edition
Woodhams , 41 ECAB Carlone , 41 ECAB For a definition of the term traumatic injury, see 20 C. Carlone , supra note 4. Williams , 44 ECAB ,